Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet SSR
5.3 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque461 Nm340 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score74/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Largest trunk1,130 L
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 461Nm340lb-ft | 449Nm331lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 2,159kg4,760lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | - |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 113.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 512km318mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 5,326cc325cu in |
| Length | 4,914mm193in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,946mm116in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,648mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 1,130L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 95L |
| CO2 emissions | 293g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 10 hp more than Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 512 km 318 mi |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 512 km 318 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 293 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 12 Nm more
- Is 554 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 km/h (23 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 176 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 915 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























