Chevrolet SSR
Car comparison
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8vsMercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz X-class
X 350d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range811 km504 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest2,159 kg4,760 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 449Nm331lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,159kg4,760lb | 2,259kg4,980lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 113.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 111.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.5s Calculated | 83.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km428mi Calculated | 811km504mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,326cc325cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 5,340mm210in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,631mm64in | 1,819mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,946mm116in | 3,150mm124in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 202mm8in |
| Max trunk volume | 1,130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 237g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 3,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 3,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.5 s | 83.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 has 42 hp more than Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 2,259 kg 4,980 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 4.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 688 km 428 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 811 km 504 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Mercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | 2,259 kg 4,980 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 428 mi | 811 km 504 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 237 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 | Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 42 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz X-class X 350d V6
- Has 101 Nm more
- Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























