Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500vsChevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet SSR
5.3 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score77/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Largest trunk1,130 L
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 449Nm331lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 2,159kg4,760lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 112.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s Calculated | 47.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 559km347mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,966cc303cu in | 5,326cc325cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,413mm56in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,946mm116in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,648mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 276L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | 1,130L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 5,600 rpm | 2,700-4,250 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 47.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 has 6 hp more than Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 6.1 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 559 km 347 mi |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 559 km 347 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 11 Nm more
- Is 449 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 854 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























