Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsChevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet SSR
5.3 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Highest torque449 Nm331 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk1,130 L
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 449Nm331lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 2,159kg4,760lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 113.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 5,326cc325cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,034mm119in | 2,946mm116in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,648mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,130L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6.6 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 780 km 485 mi |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Is 544 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 38 Nm more
- Has 660 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























