Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8vsChevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet SSR
5.3 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,810 kg3,990 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range977 km607 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque449 Nm331 lb-ft
- Largest trunk1,130 L
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 290hp216kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft | 449Nm331lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 2,159kg4,760lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 112.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 47.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 977km607mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,293cc262cu in | 5,326cc325cu in |
| Length | 5,015mm197in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,925mm115in | 2,946mm116in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,648mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 570L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,130L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 84L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 47.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 has 10 hp more than Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 6.1 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
Although Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 has more power, Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 5.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 977 km 607 mi |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 290 hp 216 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 977 km 607 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Is 349 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 288 km (179 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 560 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























