Car comparison

Cadillac XTS 28TvsCadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac XTS

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2017
VS

Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    269 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,840 kg
    4,057 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    537 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacXTS28T2013-2017CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
Power
269hp201kW
269hp201kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,840kg4,057lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Gross weight
2,260kg4,982lb
-
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
66.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
35.0s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
805km500mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
5,131mm202in
5,103mm201in
Width
1,852mm73in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,511mm59in
1,502mm59in
Wheelbase
2,837mm112in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,591mm63in
1,591mm63in
Ground clearance
137mm5in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
537L
537L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T 2017-2020PowerTorque
  • Cadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T 2017-2020: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacXTS28T2013-20175,500 rpm2,400-4,400 rpm5,750 rpm
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-20205,300 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacXTS28T2013-2017CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.0 s
35.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
269 hp
201 kW
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
269 hp
201 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
218 km/h
135 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-20178.0 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-20208.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017 and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T 2017-2020: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T 2017-2020 and Cadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
805 km
500 mi
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
269 hp
201 kW
8.0 s
218 km/h
135 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
269 hp
201 kW
8.1 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,131 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T 2017-2020 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.0 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacXTS28T2013-2017
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacXTS28T2013-2017CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T2017-2020
Power
269 hp
201 kW
269 hp
201 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,131 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in
Range score
805 km
500 mi
886 km
551 mi
Trunk score
537 L
19.0 cu ft
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T 2017-2020
Consumption8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.22 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.50 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,284 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac XTS 28T 2013-2017

  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac XTS 28T
Cadillac XTS 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacCTS III2.0
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
28T
3.6 i V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacSTS3.6 i V6
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacCT6 II28T
28T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
28T
3.0d V6
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
28T
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6
28T
EcoBoost 245
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
28T
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
28T
2.0 T5
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsVolvoS902.0 T5
28T
E 350 BlueTEC V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6
28T
P50 50 kWh
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsTeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
Cadillac XTS 28T vs Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster