Cadillac STS
Car comparison
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6vsCadillac XTS 28T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XTS
28T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Most powerful269 hp201 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range805 km500 mi
- Largest trunk537 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,782 kg3,929 lb
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 269hp201kW |
| Torque | 346Nm255lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,782kg3,929lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 541km336mi Calculated | 805km500mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,564cc217cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,985mm196in | 5,131mm202in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,464mm58in | 1,511mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,957mm116in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 137mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 464L | 537L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XTS 28T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| CadillacXTS28T | 5,500 rpm | 2,400-4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW |
Cadillac XTS 28T has 11 hp more than Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
| CadillacXTS28T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb |
| CadillacXTS28T | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 7.4 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.0 s |
Although Cadillac XTS 28T has more power, Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XTS 28T and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 541 km 336 mi |
| CadillacXTS28T | 805 km 500 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW | 8.0 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac XTS 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | CadillacXTS28T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 269 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 541 km 336 mi | 805 km 500 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | 537 L 19.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 | Cadillac XTS 28T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 54 Nm more
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























