Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20VvsCadillac STS 3.6 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac STS
3.6 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score60/100
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,782kg3,929lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 541km336mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,401cc147cu in | 3,564cc217cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,985mm196in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,957mm116in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 464L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 285g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V has 2 hp more than Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.9 s |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 541 km 336 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 285 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 262 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























