Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsCadillac STS 3.6 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac STS
3.6 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions259 g/km
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score78/100
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Best estimated range541 km336 mi
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,782kg3,929lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 537km334mi Calculated | 541km336mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 3,564cc217cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,985mm196in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,957mm116in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 464L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 259g/km | 285g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 has 3 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 537 km 334 mi |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 541 km 336 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 537 km 334 mi | 541 km 336 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 259 g/km | 285 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 | Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 19 Nm more
- Is 197 kg lighter
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























