Volkswagen Passat (B6)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSIvsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range694 km431 mi
- Largest trunk541 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.2s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km431mi Calculated | 537km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,168cc193cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,765mm188in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,752mm69in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,709mm107in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 541L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,067L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 259g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 6,250 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 250 hp 186 kW |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 6.9 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
Although Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has more power, Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 694 km 431 mi |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 537 km 334 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 431 mi | 537 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 259 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 541 L 19.1 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 157 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 116 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























