AUDI A6 (4F/C6)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6vsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions235 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk546 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 537km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,123cc191cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,916mm194in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,752mm69in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,843mm112in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 546L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 235g/km | 259g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 7.0 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 714 km 444 mi |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 537 km 334 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 537 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 235 g/km | 259 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 121 L more trunk volume
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 35 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























