Maserati Ghibli III (M157)
Car comparison
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6vsCadillac XTS 28T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XTS
28T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,835 kg4,045 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score91/100
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Largest trunk537 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 269hp201kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.3s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,186km737mi Calculated | 805km500mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,971mm196in | 5,131mm202in |
| Width | 1,945mm77in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,511mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 137mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 537L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XTS 28T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| CadillacXTS28T | 5,500 rpm | 2,400-4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.3 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW |
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 has 6 hp more than Cadillac XTS 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XTS 28T and Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| CadillacXTS28T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| CadillacXTS28T | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 6.3 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 1,186 km 737 mi |
| CadillacXTS28T | 805 km 500 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW | 8.0 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6 | CadillacXTS28T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 269 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,186 km 737 mi | 805 km 500 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 537 L 19.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6 | Cadillac XTS 28T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) 3.0 V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 382 km (237 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























