Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 3.5 V6vsCadillac XTS 28T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XTS
28T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Most powerful269 hp201 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range805 km500 mi
- Largest trunk537 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 269hp201kW |
| Torque | 346Nm255lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 805km500mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 5,131mm202in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,511mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 137mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 483L | 537L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 215g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XTS 28T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| CadillacXTS28T | 5,500 rpm | 2,400-4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW |
Cadillac XTS 28T has 19 hp more than Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
| CadillacXTS28T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| CadillacXTS28T | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 7.1 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.0 s |
Although Cadillac XTS 28T has more power, Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XTS 28T and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 753 km 468 mi |
| CadillacXTS28T | 805 km 500 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW | 8.0 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | CadillacXTS28T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 269 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 805 km 500 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 215 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 483 L 17.1 cu ft | 537 L 19.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 | Cadillac XTS 28T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 54 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























