Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions179 g/km
- Best estimated range840 km522 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque346 Nm255 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk483 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 59.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 840km522mi Calculated | 753km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 483L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 215g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 7.1 s |
Although Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 753 km 468 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 840 km 522 mi | 753 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 215 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 483 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 6 Nm more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























