Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range840 km522 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 840km522mi Calculated | 831km517mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,962mm195in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 459L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,484L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 831 km 517 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 840 km 522 mi | 831 km 517 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 9 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























