Car comparison

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6vsCadillac XTS 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156)

3.0 V6

275 hp2987 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2016
VS

Cadillac XTS

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,129 km
    702 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6CadillacXTS28T
Power
275hp205kW
269hp201kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Gross weight-
2,260kg4,982lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
68.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
20.5s
Calculated
35.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,129km702mi
Calculated
805km500mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,987cc182cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
5,262mm207in
5,131mm202in
Width
1,948mm77in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,481mm58in
1,511mm59in
Wheelbase
3,171mm125in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,634mm64in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,647mm65in
1,591mm63in
Ground clearance-
137mm5in
Trunk volume
530L
537L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6Cadillac XTS 28TPowerTorque
  • Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XTS 28T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V64,000 rpm2,000-2,600 rpm4,250 rpm
CadillacXTS28T5,500 rpm2,400-4,400 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6CadillacXTS28T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.5 s
35.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
CadillacXTS28T
269 hp
201 kW

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 has 6 hp more than Cadillac XTS 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XTS 28T and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
CadillacXTS28T
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
CadillacXTS28T
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacXTS28T
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V66.4 s
CadillacXTS28T8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
CadillacXTS28T
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
CadillacXTS28T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
1,129 km
702 mi
CadillacXTS28T
805 km
500 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacXTS28T
269 hp
201 kW
8.0 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
CadillacXTS28T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,131 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
CadillacXTS28T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.4 s
CadillacXTS28T
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
CadillacXTS28T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6CadillacXTS28T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
269 hp
201 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,131 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Range score
1,129 km
702 mi
805 km
500 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
-
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6Cadillac XTS 28T
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 324 km (202 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac XTS 28T

  • Has 7 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
Cadillac XTS 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
4.9
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6vsMaseratiQuattroporte III4.9
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
3.0 V6
2.0 Biturbo
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6vsMaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacCTS III2.0
3.0 V6
S Q4 3.0 GDI
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)Facelift 2016S Q4 3.0 GDI
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
3.0 V6
4.7
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6vsMaseratiQuattroporte S4.7
28T
3.6 i V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacSTS3.6 i V6
3.0 V6
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6vsMaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V
28T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
3.0 V6
4.7
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6vsMaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7
28T
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 vs Cadillac XTS 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster