Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6vsCadillac XTS 28T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XTS
28T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,840 kg4,057 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range983 km611 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score91/100
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Most powerful269 hp201 kW
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk537 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 269hp201kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 983km611mi Calculated | 805km500mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 5,131mm202in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,511mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,591mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 137mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 537L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XTS 28T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 3,400 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 3,650 rpm |
| CadillacXTS28T | 5,500 rpm | 2,400-4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | CadillacXTS28T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW |
Cadillac XTS 28T has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| CadillacXTS28T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb |
| CadillacXTS28T | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 6.6 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.0 s |
Although Cadillac XTS 28T has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 983 km 611 mi |
| CadillacXTS28T | 805 km 500 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXTS28T | 269 hp 201 kW | 8.0 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXTS28T |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| CadillacXTS28T | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| CadillacXTS28T | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6 | CadillacXTS28T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 269 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb | 1,840 kg 4,057 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 983 km 611 mi | 805 km 500 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 537 L 19.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6 | Cadillac XTS 28T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 350 BlueTEC V6
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 179 km (111 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac XTS 28T
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























