Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsCadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T

  • Most powerful
    269 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    353 Nm
    260 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    537 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
237hp177kW
269hp201kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
66.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
5,103mm201in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,502mm59in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,591mm63in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
508L
537L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TCadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T5,300 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
35.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
269 hp
201 kW

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T has 32 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T8.1 s

Although Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T has more power, Cadillac CT6 II 28T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
269 hp
201 kW
8.1 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Cadillac CT6 II 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
269 hp
201 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
886 km
551 mi
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28TCadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 29 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Cadillac XTS 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacXTS28T
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacCTS III2.0
28T
380TSI
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
28T
530i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
28T
3.0d V6
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
28T
EcoBoost 245
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
28T
E 200
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
28T
2.0 T5
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsVolvoS902.0 T5
Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster