Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214)

E 200

204 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
Power
237hp177kW
204hp152kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Gross weight-
2,515kg5,545lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
70.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
27.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
846km526mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
4,949mm195in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,469mm58in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,961mm117in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,629mm64in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,643mm65in
Trunk volume
508L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TMercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 2005,800 rpm1,600-4,000 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
27.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
204 hp
152 kW

Cadillac CT6 II 28T has 33 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 33 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
1,815 kg
4,001 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 2007.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
846 km
526 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.6 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,949 mm
194.8 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Cadillac CT6 II 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
Power
237 hp
177 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,949 mm
194.8 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
846 km
526 mi
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28TMercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Has 33 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
28T
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
E 200
E 250 BlueTEC
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC
28T
380TSI
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020E 200
28T
530i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
E 200
E 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250d
Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster