Cadillac CT6 II
Car comparison
Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 300 98 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCT6 II28T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,880kg6,349lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 64.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 29.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,109mm122in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 895L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCT6 II28T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 29.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh has 8 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCT6 II28T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Is 550 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























