Cadillac CT6 II
Car comparison
Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score57/100
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCT6 II28T | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,109mm122in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,606mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | 394L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,275L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCT6 II28T | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 13 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCT6 II28T | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 394 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























