Cadillac CT6 II
Car comparison
Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsBMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series Sedan (G60)
530i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range935 km581 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCT6 II28T | BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,886kg4,158lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,415kg5,324lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 52.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 5,060mm199in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,109mm122in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 155mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCT6 II28T | BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 255 hp 190 kW |
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i has 18 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 1,886 kg 4,158 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 935 km 581 mi |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCT6 II28T | BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,886 kg 4,158 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T | BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Is 126 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























