Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsBMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60)

530i

255 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Most powerful
    255 hp
    190 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
Power
237hp177kW
255hp190kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,886kg4,158lb
Gross weight-
2,415kg5,324lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
52.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
24.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
769km478mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
5,060mm199in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,900mm75in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,515mm60in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,995mm118in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,623mm64in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,656mm65in
Ground clearance-
155mm6in
Trunk volume
508L
520L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TBMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530iPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i4,700-6,500 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
24.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
165 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
255 hp
190 kW

BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i has 18 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
1,886 kg
4,158 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i6.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
769 km
478 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
255 hp
190 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
5,060 mm
199.2 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
Power
237 hp
177 kW
255 hp
190 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,886 kg
4,158 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
5,060 mm
199.2 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
769 km
478 mi
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28TBMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Is 126 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs BMW 5 Series Sedan (G60) 530i - car comparison - FastVsFaster