Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsCadillac CT6 II 28T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CT6 II
28T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | CadillacCT6 II28T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 935km581mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 5,223mm206in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,109mm122in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,631mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,652mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | CadillacCT6 II28T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 13 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 7.0 s |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | CadillacCT6 II28T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 935 km 581 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























