Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTECvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W214)
E 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,800 kg3,968 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,113 km692 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,515kg5,545lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t85kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,113km692mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,949mm195in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,469mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,961mm117in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,643mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 5,800 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 1,113 km 692 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,113 km 692 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























