Car comparison

Volvo S90 2.0 T5vsCadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S90

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2020
VS

Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S90 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,825 kg
    4,023 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T

  • Most powerful
    269 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    353 Nm
    260 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    537 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS902.0 T5CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
250hp186kW
269hp201kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,825kg4,023lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
65.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
66.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
23.1s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
821km510mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,963mm195in
5,103mm201in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,502mm59in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,591mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
500L
537L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions
156g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S90 2.0 T5Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28TPowerTorque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS902.0 T55,500 rpm-6,000 rpm
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T5,300 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS902.0 T5CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.1 s
35.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
269 hp
201 kW

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T has 19 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T56.8 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T8.1 s

Although Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T has more power, Volvo S90 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 T5
821 km
510 mi
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS902.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
269 hp
201 kW
8.1 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS902.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS902.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Volvo S90 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS902.0 T5
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
6.8 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS902.0 T5
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS902.0 T5CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
250 hp
186 kW
269 hp
201 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in
Range score
821 km
510 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
156 g/km
-
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S90 2.0 T5Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S90 2.0 T5

  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 65 km (41 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 37 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
Cadillac XTS 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacXTS28T
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsJaguarXF (X260)25t
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacCTS III2.0
2.0 T5
E 300d
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
2.0 T5
45 TFSI
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacCT6 II28T
2.0 T5
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
2.0 T5
Redline 550T
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T
28T
EcoBoost 245
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
2.0 T5
P250
VS
VolvoS902.0 T5vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 vs Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster