Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T5vsJaguar XF (X260) 25t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
25t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,629 kg3,591 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T5 | JaguarXF (X260)25t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,629kg3,591lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 63.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 1,014km630mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 166g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | - | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T5 | JaguarXF (X260)25t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25t and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 821 km 510 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 1,014 km 630 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)25t |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T5 | JaguarXF (X260)25t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 1,014 km 630 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 166 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T5 | Jaguar XF (X260) 25t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 196 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 193 km (120 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























