Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5vsVolvo S90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,589 kg3,503 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,144km711mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | - | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 has 5 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 6.3 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T5 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | VolvoS902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,144 km 711 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 | Volvo S90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Is 236 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 323 km (201 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























