Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T5vsChevrolet Malibu (XL) · Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Malibu (XL) · Facelift 2019
Redline 550T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range896 km556 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T5 | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 241hp180kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,933mm194in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,589mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,591mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | - | 6,000 rpm |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T5 | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 241 hp 180 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 has 9 hp more than Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 821 km 510 mi |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 896 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 241 hp 180 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T5 | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T5 | Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























