Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T5vsVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T5 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,485kg3,274lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,476mm176in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,531mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | - | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T5 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 has 20 hp more than Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 821 km 510 mi |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T5 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T5 | Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
- Has 96 L more trunk volume
- Emits 55 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























