Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 25dvsVolvo S90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,733 kg3,821 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,158 km719 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)25d | VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,733kg3,821lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | - |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,158km719mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | - | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)25d | VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T5 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Volvo S90 2.0 T5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,158 km 719 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T5 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T5 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)25d | VolvoS902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,158 km 719 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 25d | Volvo S90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 337 km (209 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo S90 2.0 T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























