Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022

2.0TD T4 Evo

218 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Largest trunk
    508 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TLynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
237hp177kW
218hp163kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
56.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
32.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
847km527mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
4,684mm184in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,843mm73in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
508L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TLynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 EvoPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo5,000 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TLynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
32.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
218 hp
163 kW

Cadillac CT6 II 28T has 19 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo7.2 s

Although Cadillac CT6 II 28T has more power, Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
847 km
527 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
218 hp
163 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,684 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Cadillac CT6 II 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TLynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
237 hp
177 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,684 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
847 km
527 mi
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28TLynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 88 km (54 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 94 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD T4 Evo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
28T
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.0d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0TD T4 Evo
380TSI
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
2.0TD T4 Evo
A 250
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022A 250
28T
530i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
2.0TD T4 Evo
320d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d
28T
E 200
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
2.0TD T4 Evo
C 200
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo - car comparison - FastVsFaster