Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
2.0TD T4 Evo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,037 km644 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score92/100
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 325Nm240lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 56.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,037km644mi Calculated | 847km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,684mm184in |
| Width | - | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,608mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 356L | 414L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,236L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 218 hp 163 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo has 14 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.3 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,037 km 644 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 847 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 325 Nm 240 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,037 km 644 mi | 847 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 105 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 87 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 58 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























