Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsLincoln Z 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Lincoln Z

2.0T

261 hp1995 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lincoln Z 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Most powerful
    261 hp
    195 kW
  • Highest torque
    393 Nm
    290 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,635 kg
    3,605 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    160 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Largest trunk
    508 L
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TLincolnZ2.0T
Power
237hp177kW
261hp195kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
393Nm290lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,635kg3,605lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
60.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
24.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
917km570mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
4,982mm196in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,485mm58in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,930mm115in
Front track
1,631mm64in
-
Rear track
1,652mm65in
-
Trunk volume
508L
489L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TLincoln Z 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • Lincoln Z 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
LincolnZ2.0T5,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TLincolnZ2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
24.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
162 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
LincolnZ2.0T
261 hp
195 kW

Lincoln Z 2.0T has 24 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
LincolnZ2.0T
393 Nm
290 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
LincolnZ2.0T
1,635 kg
3,605 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
LincolnZ2.0T
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
LincolnZ2.0T7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
LincolnZ2.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
LincolnZ2.0T
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi
LincolnZ2.0T
917 km
570 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
LincolnZ2.0T
261 hp
195 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
LincolnZ2.0T
Power
261 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
489 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,982 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
LincolnZ2.0T
Power
261 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Lincoln Z 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
LincolnZ2.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
LincolnZ2.0T
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TLincolnZ2.0T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
261 hp
195 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
393 Nm
290 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
489 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,982 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
917 km
570 mi
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
489 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28TLincoln Z 2.0T
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 19 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Lincoln Z 2.0T

  • Has 24 hp more
  • Has 43 Nm more
  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Lincoln Z 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
28T
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
LincolnZ2.0TvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh
2.0T
330i
VS
LincolnZ2.0TvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022330i
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0T
E 300
VS
LincolnZ2.0TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300
28T
380TSI
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
28T
530i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
2.0T
735i
VS
LincolnZ2.0TvsBMW7 Series (G70)735i
2.0T
60 kWh
VS
LincolnZ2.0TvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
28T
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Lincoln Z 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster