Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300vsLincoln Z 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLincoln Z
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range917 km570 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Most powerful261 hp195 kW
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 261hp195kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,450kg5,401lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | 917km570mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,949mm195in | 4,982mm196in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,961mm117in | 2,930mm115in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 489L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 5,800 rpm | 2,000-3,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW |
Lincoln Z 2.0T has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300 and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 6.3 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 7.0 s |
Although Lincoln Z 2.0T has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300 and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 917 km 570 mi |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 917 km 570 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300 | LincolnZ2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 261 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | 917 km 570 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300 | Lincoln Z 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 300
- Has 7 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























