Lincoln Z
Car comparison
Lincoln Z 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 300 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk489 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | LincolnZ2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 261hp195kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 393Nm290lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,975kg6,559lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.7s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,982mm196in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,930mm115in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | - | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 489L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LincolnZ2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.7 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 100 kWh has 4 hp more than Lincoln Z 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 100 kWh: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | 7.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 100 kWh and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LincolnZ2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 261 hp 195 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lincoln Z 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Is 665 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 59 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 157 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























