Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019

28T 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    150 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    523 L
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
237hp177kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
5,026mm198in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,866mm73in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,905mm114in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,599mm63in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,602mm63in
Trunk volume
508L
-
Max trunk volume-
523L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TBuick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.05,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
26.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 has 3 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.07.5 s

Although Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 has more power, Cadillac CT6 II 28T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Cadillac CT6 II 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
237 hp
177 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
-
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28TBuick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Buick LaCrosse III China 28T 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
28T
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
28T 2.0
2.0i
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh
28T 2.0
25d
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)25d
28T 2.0
2.0i
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
28T
380TSI
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
28T 2.0
45 TDI V6
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TDI V6
28T
530i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
28T 2.0
Redline 550T
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
28T 2.0
730i
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019730i
28T
E 200
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster