Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 25dvsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019
28T 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)25d | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,733kg3,821lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | - |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,158km719mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 5,026mm198in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,866mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,905mm114in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,599mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 523L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
- Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)25d | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 6.9 s |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)25d | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,158 km 719 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 523 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 25d | Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
- Is 133 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























