Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 25dvsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

25d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020
VS

Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019

28T 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    246 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)25dBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,733kg3,821lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,370kg5,225lb
-
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,158km719mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
5,026mm198in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,866mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,905mm114in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,599mm63in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,602mm63in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Max trunk volume-
523L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-
CO2 emissions
155g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 25dBuick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)25d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.05,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)25dBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
26.7 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)25d
240 hp
179 kW
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)25d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)25d
1,733 kg
3,821 lb
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)25d
246 km/h
153 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)25d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)25d
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)25d
240 hp
179 kW
6.9 s
246 km/h
153 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)25d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.9 s
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)25d
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)25dBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,733 kg
3,821 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Range score
1,158 km
719 mi
-
CO2 score
155 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 25dBuick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
Buick LaCrosse III China 28T 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d vs Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster