Chevrolet Malibu (XL) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) · Facelift 2019 Redline 550TvsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019
28T 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
- Largest trunk523 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 241hp180kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 896km556mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,933mm194in | 5,026mm198in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,866mm73in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,905mm114in |
| Front track | 1,589mm63in | 1,599mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,591mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 523L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T: Power / Torque
- Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 241 hp 180 kW |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T has 1 hp more than Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 and Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 7.2 s |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 241 hp 180 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 241 hp 180 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 896 km 556 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 523 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T | Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























