Bentley Mulsanne II
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 · Stage 3vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 · Stage 2vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 · Stage 1vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne II
6.75 V8 (Stage 2)
Bentley Mulsanne II
6.75 V8 (Stage 1)
Bentley Mulsanne II
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed346 km/h215 mph
- Most powerful768 hp573 kW
- Highest torque1,581 Nm1,166 lb-ft
- Lightest2,585 kg5,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight297 hp/t222 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption25.3 L/100 km9.3 mpg US11.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range568 km353 mi
- Largest trunk443 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score62/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 768hp573kW+256 hp | 666hp496kW+154 hp | 604hp451kW+92 hp | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 1,581Nm1,166lb-ft+561 Nm | 1,377Nm1,016lb-ft+357 Nm | 1,244Nm918lb-ft+224 Nm | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 3,090kg6,812lb | 3,090kg6,812lb | 3,090kg6,812lb | 3,090kg6,812lb |
| Top speed | 346 km/h 215 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | 323 km/h 201 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 343 km/h / 213 mph-12.6 s Calculated | 56.8s99% target: 329 km/h / 204 mph-7.0 s Calculated | 60.6s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph-3.2 s Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s-1.2 s | 4.5s-0.8 s | 4.8s-0.5 s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s-4.8 s Calculated | 11.5s-3.4 s Calculated | 12.6s-2.4 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s-1.1 s Calculated | 4.3s-0.8 s Calculated | 4.6s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s-1.6 s Calculated | 12.1s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.5s-0.7 s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 297hp/t222kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 612Nm/t409lb-ft/ton Calculated | 533Nm/t356lb-ft/ton Calculated | 481Nm/t322lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 568km353mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 5,575mm219in | 5,575mm219in | 5,575mm219in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,521mm60in | 1,521mm60in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 3,266mm129in | 3,266mm129in | 3,266mm129in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 443L | 443L | 443L | 443L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 96L | 96L | 96L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 1) 604 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 512 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 11.5 s | 12.6 s | 14.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 30.1 s | 43.1 s | 74.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 346 km/h 215 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | 323 km/h 201 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.1 s | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 207 km/h 128 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 768 hp 573 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 666 hp 496 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 604 hp 451 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 512 hp 382 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp has 256 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 512 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 512 hp and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp: 256 hp (191 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 1,581 Nm 1,166 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 1,377 Nm 1,016 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 1,244 Nm 918 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 346 km/h 215 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 4.1 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 4.5 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 4.8 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 512 hp: 1.2 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 1) 604 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 297 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 568 km 353 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 568 km 353 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 568 km 353 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 568 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 768 hp 573 kW | 4.1 s | 346 km/h 215 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 666 hp 496 kW | 4.5 s | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 604 hp 451 kW | 4.8 s | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 297 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8512 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 768 hp 573 kW | 666 hp 496 kW | 604 hp 451 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,581 Nm 1,166 lb-ft | 1,377 Nm 1,016 lb-ft | 1,244 Nm 918 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 346 km/h 215 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | 323 km/h 201 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 568 km 353 mi | 568 km 353 mi | 568 km 353 mi | 568 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 297 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 1) 604 hp | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 512 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 204 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























