Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne II
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range604 km376 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 3,090kg6,812lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km376mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,981mm196in | 5,575mm219in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 3,266mm129in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,563mm62in | 1,652mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 443L |
| Max trunk volume | 963L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 38 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 5.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 604 km 376 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 568 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 376 mi | 568 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Has 38 hp more
- Is 710 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 95 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Has 97 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Has 340 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























