Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023
VS

AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023

45 TDI V6

231 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,160 kg
    4,762 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    107 hp/t
    80 kW/t
    9.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
Power
254hp189kW
231hp172kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
2,160kg4,762lb
Gross weight-
2,900kg6,393lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
94.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
36.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
955km593mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,967cc181cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
4,992mm197in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,995mm79in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,697mm67in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,998mm118in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,679mm66in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,691mm67in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
-
Trunk volume
264L
605L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
85L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6PowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V63,500-5,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
36.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
231 hp
172 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 23 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 23 hp (17 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
2,160 kg
4,762 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V67.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: 8.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
955 km
593 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
231 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,992 mm
196.5 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
Power
254 hp
189 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
7.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,992 mm
196.5 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
Range score
7,368 km
4,579 mi
955 km
593 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
Consumption1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.66 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.68 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used143 L38 US gal31 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost249.38 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 23 hp more
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 8.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,413 km (3,985 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 310 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 341 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
45 TDI V6
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6vsAUDIQ640 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TDI V6
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
45 TDI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
45 TDI V6
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
45 TDI V6
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6vsAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster