AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score89/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | - |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.6s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 955km593mi Calculated | 1,014km630mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,992mm197in | 4,682mm184in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,520L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 4,475-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,375 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.6 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 has 27 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 955 km 593 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 955 km 593 mi | 1,014 km 630 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI
- Is 405 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























