Car comparison

Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsAspark OWL 64 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Rimac Nevera

120 kWh

1914 hpElectricAWDCoupe2021-present
VS

Aspark OWL

64 kWh

2012 hpElectricAWDCoupe2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Most powerful
    2,012 hp
    1,500 kW
  • Lightest
    1,900 kg
    4,189 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    1,059 hp/t
    790 kW/t
    0.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    94/100

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Fastest top speed
    412 km/h
    256 mph
  • Highest torque
    2,360 Nm
    1,741 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRimacNevera120 kWhAsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
1,914hp1,427kW
2,012hp1,500kW
Torque
2,360Nm1,741lb-ft
2,000Nm1,475lb-ft
Curb weight
2,150kg4,740lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
400 km/h
249 mph
To 99% top speed
34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph
Calculated
28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.0s
1.9s
0-200 km/h
4.8s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
1.9s
Calculated
1.8s
Calculated
Quarter mile
8.5s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb
Calculated
1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton
Calculated
1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,750mm187in
4,791mm189in
Width
1,986mm78in
1,935mm76in
Height
1,208mm48in
993mm39in
Wheelbase
2,745mm108in
2,750mm108in
Ground clearance-
160mm6in
Trunk volume-
50L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRimacNevera120 kWhAsparkOWL64 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.9 s
1.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.0 s
1.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.8 s
4.5 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
11.1 s
10.5 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
400 km/h
249 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.5 s
330 ft
101 m
3.9 s
3.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.7 s
5.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.2 s
7.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.5 s
8.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
284 km/h
176 mph
290 km/h
180 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW

Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 98 hp more than Rimac Nevera 120 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 98 hp (73 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,900 kg
4,189 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
412 km/h
256 mph
AsparkOWL64 kWh
400 km/h
249 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh2.0 s
AsparkOWL64 kWh1.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2.0 s
412 km/h
256 mph
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
0-100 km/h2.0 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
AsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRimacNevera120 kWhAsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
Torque
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.0 s
1.9 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
400 km/h
249 mph
Lightness
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
Trunk score
-
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Has 360 Nm more
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Has 98 hp more
  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 169 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
120 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
120 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
120 kWh
90 kWh
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsRimacConcept One90 kWh
64 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
120 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
64 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
64 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsLamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8
64 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsLamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12
64 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsFerrari812 Superfast6.5 V12
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh vs Aspark OWL 64 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster