Car comparison

Aspark OWL 64 kWhvsMcLaren 720S 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aspark OWL

64 kWh

2012 hpElectricAWDCoupe2020-present
VS

McLaren 720S

4.0 V8

720 hp3994 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

McLaren 720S 4.0 V8

  • Lightest
    1,419 kg
    3,128 lb
  • Largest trunk
    360 L
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    40/100

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    2,012 hp
    1,500 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,000 Nm
    1,475 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    1,059 hp/t
    790 kW/t
    0.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAsparkOWL64 kWhMcLaren720S4.0 V8
Power
2,012hp1,500kW
720hp537kW
Torque
2,000Nm1,475lb-ft
770Nm568lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,419kg3,128lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
341 km/h
212 mph
To 99% top speed
28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
44.9s99% target: 338 km/h / 210 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
4.5s
Calculated
7.8s
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.3s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb
Calculated
507hp/t378kW/t230hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton
Calculated
543Nm/t363lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement-
3,994cc244cu in
Length
4,791mm189in
4,543mm179in
Width
1,935mm76in
1,930mm76in
Height
993mm39in
1,196mm47in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,670mm105in
Front track-
1,674mm66in
Rear track-
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
160mm6in
-
Trunk volume
50L
360L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
CO2 emissions-
249g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAsparkOWL64 kWhMcLaren720S4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.5 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
10.5 s
27.3 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
341 km/h
212 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.1 s
8.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.3 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
290 km/h
180 mph
232 km/h
144 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
McLaren720S4.0 V8
720 hp
537 kW

Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 1,292 hp more than McLaren 720S 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between McLaren 720S 4.0 V8 and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 1,292 hp (963 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
McLaren720S4.0 V8
770 Nm
568 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
McLaren720S4.0 V8
1,419 kg
3,128 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
400 km/h
249 mph
McLaren720S4.0 V8
341 km/h
212 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh1.9 s
McLaren720S4.0 V82.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and McLaren 720S 4.0 V8: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
McLaren720S4.0 V8
507 hp/t
378 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
McLaren720S4.0 V8
720 hp
537 kW
2.9 s
341 km/h
212 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
McLaren720S4.0 V8
Power
720 hp
537 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
341 km/h
212 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,543 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,196 mm
47.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAsparkOWL64 kWhMcLaren720S4.0 V8
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
720 hp
537 kW
Torque
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
341 km/h
212 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,419 kg
3,128 lb
Fuel consumption
-
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,543 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,196 mm
47.1 in
CO2 score
-
249 g/km
Trunk score
50 L
1.8 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
507 hp/t
378 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMcLaren 720S 4.0 V8
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Has 1,292 hp more
  • Has 1,230 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 59 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 552 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

McLaren 720S 4.0 V8

  • Is 481 kg lighter
  • Has 310 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
McLaren 720S 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

64 kWh
120 kWh
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsRimacNevera120 kWh
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren720S4.0 V8vsMcLaren720S Spider4.0 V8
64 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren720S4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
64 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren720S4.0 V8vsMcLaren750S4.0 V8
64 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
4.0 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren720S4.0 V8vsMcLaren620R3.8 V8
64 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
4.0 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren720S4.0 V8vsMcLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
64 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
4.0 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren720S4.0 V8vsMcLaren600LT3.8 V8
Aspark OWL 64 kWh vs McLaren 720S 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster