McLaren Speedtail
Car comparison
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8vsAspark OWL 64 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAspark OWL
64 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed403 km/h250 mph
- Lightest1,597 kg3,521 lb
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h1.9 s
- Most powerful2,012 hp1,500 kW
- Highest torque2,000 Nm1,475 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight1,059 hp/t790 kW/t0.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | AsparkOWL64 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,070hp798kW | 2,012hp1,500kW |
| Torque | 1,150Nm848lb-ft | 2,000Nm1,475lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,597kg3,521lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 399 km/h / 248 mph Calculated | 28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 1.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.2s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 1.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 670hp/t500kW/t304hp/1000 lb Calculated | 1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 720Nm/t482lb-ft/ton Calculated | 1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,137mm202in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,935mm76in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 993mm39in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,750mm108in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 50L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | AsparkOWL64 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 1.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 1.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 16.6 s | 10.5 s |
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 3.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 5.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 8.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 250 km/h 155 mph | 290 km/h 180 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 2,012 hp 1,500 kW |
Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 942 hp more than McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 942 hp (702 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,150 Nm 848 lb-ft |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 2,000 Nm 1,475 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 400 km/h 249 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 1.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 1,059 hp/t 790 kW/t 0.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 3.0 s | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 2,012 hp 1,500 kW | 1.9 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AsparkOWL64 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | AsparkOWL64 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 2,012 hp 1,500 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,150 Nm 848 lb-ft | 2,000 Nm 1,475 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 1.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | 400 km/h 249 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 50 L 1.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 1,059 hp/t 790 kW/t 0.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,095 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Is 303 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
- Has 942 hp more
- Has 850 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 389 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























