Car comparison

Aspark OWL 64 kWhvsBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aspark OWL

64 kWh

2012 hpElectricAWDCoupe2020-present
VS

Bugatti Centodieci

8.0 W16

1600 hp7993 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2022-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    2,012 hp
    1,500 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,000 Nm
    1,475 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,900 kg
    4,189 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    1,059 hp/t
    790 kW/t
    0.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAsparkOWL64 kWhBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
2,012hp1,500kW
1,600hp1,193kW
Torque
2,000Nm1,475lb-ft
1,600Nm1,180lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
44.2s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
2.4s
0-200 km/h
4.5s
Calculated
6.1s
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.3s
Calculated
9.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb
Calculated
802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton
Calculated
802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
465km289mi
Calculated
Displacement-
7,993cc488cu in
Length
4,791mm189in
4,665mm184in
Width
1,935mm76in
2,020mm80in
Height
993mm39in
1,215mm48in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,711mm107in
Front track-
1,749mm69in
Rear track-
1,666mm66in
Ground clearance
160mm6in
125mm5in
Trunk volume
50L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
100L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAsparkOWL64 kWhBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
2.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.5 s
6.1 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
10.5 s
15.3 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.7 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.1 s
7.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.3 s
9.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
290 km/h
180 mph
258 km/h
160 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 hp
1,193 kW

Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 412 hp more than Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16.

The biggest power difference is between Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 412 hp (307 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,995 kg
4,398 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
400 km/h
249 mph
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh1.9 s
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W162.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AsparkOWL64 kWh
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
802 hp/t
598 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AsparkOWL64 kWh
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
2.4 s
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AsparkOWL64 kWh
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,665 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,215 mm
47.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAsparkOWL64 kWhBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
2,012 hp
1,500 kW
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
Torque
2,000 Nm
1,475 lb-ft
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
2.4 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
Fuel consumption
-
21.5 L/100 km
10.9 mpg US
13.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
50 L
1.8 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
993 mm
39.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,665 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,215 mm
47.8 in
Range score
-
465 km
289 mi
Trunk score
50 L
1.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
1,059 hp/t
790 kW/t
0.9 kg/hp
802 hp/t
598 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Consumption21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km37.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi60.55 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,644 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aspark OWL 64 kWh

  • Has 412 hp more
  • Has 400 Nm more
  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 257 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

64 kWh
120 kWh
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsRimacNevera120 kWh
8.0 W16
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0 W16
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
64 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
8.0 W16
8.3 V16
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsBugattiTourbillon8.3 V16
64 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
8.0 W16
90 kWh
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsRimacConcept One90 kWh
64 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsLamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12
8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsMcLarenW14.0 V8
64 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
AsparkOWL64 kWhvsLamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12
8.0 W16
6.5 V12
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsLamborghiniCountach LPI 800-46.5 V12
Aspark OWL 64 kWh vs Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 - car comparison - FastVsFaster