Aspark OWL
Car comparison
Aspark OWL 64 kWhvsFerrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 812 Superfast
6.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h1.9 s
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Most powerful2,012 hp1,500 kW
- Highest torque2,000 Nm1,475 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight1,059 hp/t790 kW/t0.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score94/100
Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best overall score76/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AsparkOWL64 kWh | Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 2,012hp1,500kW | 800hp597kW |
| Torque | 2,000Nm1,475lb-ft | 718Nm530lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 28.9s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 46.1s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 1.9s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.5s Calculated | 7.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 1.8s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.3s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 1,059hp/t790kW/t480hp/1000 lb Calculated | 491hp/t366kW/t223hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,053Nm/t704lb-ft/ton Calculated | 440Nm/t295lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 617km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 6,496cc396cu in |
| Length | 4,791mm189in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,935mm76in | 1,971mm78in |
| Height | 993mm39in | 1,276mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,750mm108in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,672mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 50L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 92L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AsparkOWL64 kWh | Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.8 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 1.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 10.5 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.8 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.6 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.1 s | 8.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.3 s | 10.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 290 km/h 180 mph | 231 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 2,012 hp 1,500 kW |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 800 hp 597 kW |
Aspark OWL 64 kWh has 1,212 hp more than Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12 and Aspark OWL 64 kWh: 1,212 hp (904 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 2,000 Nm 1,475 lb-ft |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 718 Nm 530 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 1.9 s |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 2.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aspark OWL 64 kWh and Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 1,059 hp/t 790 kW/t 0.9 kg/hp |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 491 hp/t 366 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh | 2,012 hp 1,500 kW | 1.9 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 800 hp 597 kW | 2.9 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AsparkOWL64 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AsparkOWL64 kWh | Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 2,012 hp 1,500 kW | 800 hp 597 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 2,000 Nm 1,475 lb-ft | 718 Nm 530 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 1.9 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 617 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 50 L 1.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 1,059 hp/t 790 kW/t 0.9 kg/hp | 491 hp/t 366 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aspark OWL 64 kWh
- Has 1,212 hp more
- Has 1,282 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
- Has 568 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12
- Is 270 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























