Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo · Stage 3vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo · Stage 2vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo · Stage 1vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque512 Nm377 lb-ft
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight210 hp/t157 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best estimated range817 km508 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW+100 hp | 260hp194kW+60 hp | 236hp176kW+36 hp | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 512Nm377lb-ft+182 Nm | 446Nm329lb-ft+116 Nm | 403Nm297lb-ft+73 Nm | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 2,005kg4,420lb | 2,005kg4,420lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 51.3s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph-8.1 s Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-4.5 s Calculated | 57.1s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph-2.3 s Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s-1.5 s | 5.6s-1.0 s | 6.0s-0.6 s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s-9.2 s Calculated | 17.0s-6.8 s Calculated | 18.9s-4.8 s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s-1.6 s Calculated | 13.5s-1.1 s Calculated | 13.9s-0.7 s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 817km508mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,643mm183in | 4,643mm183in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,860mm73in | 1,860mm73in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,438mm57in | 1,438mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,820mm111in | 2,820mm111in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,571mm62in | 1,571mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,641mm65in | 1,641mm65in | 1,641mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 480L | 480L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L | 58L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 164g/km | 164g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 260 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 236 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo 200 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.6 s | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 17.0 s | 18.9 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.5 s | 11.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s | 13.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp has 100 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo 200 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo 200 hp and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 512 Nm 377 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 446 Nm 329 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 403 Nm 297 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 5.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 5.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 6.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo 200 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 260 hp and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 236 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 817 km 508 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 817 km 508 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 817 km 508 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 817 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.1 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW | 5.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW | 6.0 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)300 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)260 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)236 hp | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo200 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | 236 hp 176 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 512 Nm 377 lb-ft | 446 Nm 329 lb-ft | 403 Nm 297 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.6 s | 6.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 817 km 508 mi | 817 km 508 mi | 817 km 508 mi | 817 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 164 g/km | 164 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 260 hp | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 236 hp | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo 200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 66 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 260 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























