Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurbovsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.0 Turbo

200 hp1995 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2022
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)

E 200

197 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    817 km
    508 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
200hp149kW
197hp147kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,679kg3,702lb
Gross weight
2,005kg4,420lb
2,414kg5,322lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
70.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
28.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
817km508mi
Calculated
694km432mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,923mm194in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,939mm116in
Front track
1,571mm62in
-
Rear track
1,641mm65in
1,619mm64in
Trunk volume
480L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
50L
CO2 emissions
164g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurboMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo4,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 2005,500 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
28.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
197 hp
147 kW

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
1,679 kg
3,702 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo6.6 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 2007.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
817 km
508 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
694 km
432 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
197 hp
147 kW
7.6 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,923 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.6 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
197 hp
147 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,679 kg
3,702 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,923 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
817 km
508 mi
694 km
432 mi
CO2 score
164 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurboMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Turbo
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
2.0 Turbo
A 220
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 220d
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
E 200
E 250 BlueTEC
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC
2.0 Turbo
C 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200
2.0 Turbo
40 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201640 TFSI
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020E 200
2.0 Turbo
C 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
E 200
E 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250d
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster