Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 220dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions126 g/km
- Best estimated range854 km531 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 194hp145kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 854km531mi Calculated | 817km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,641mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 126g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | - | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 3,050 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 6.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 854 km 531 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 817 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 194 hp 145 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 854 km 531 mi | 817 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 126 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























